From dd205fbad642ace6d0e33c8553f7d73404f140b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Kuhn <suraia@ikkoku.de>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 14:37:51 +0200
Subject: Update HTML Purifier to version 4.4.0.

---
 .../ConfigSchema/schema/HTML.AllowedCommentsRegexp.txt    | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 lib/htmlpurifier/library/HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/HTML.AllowedCommentsRegexp.txt

(limited to 'lib/htmlpurifier/library/HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/HTML.AllowedCommentsRegexp.txt')

diff --git a/lib/htmlpurifier/library/HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/HTML.AllowedCommentsRegexp.txt b/lib/htmlpurifier/library/HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/HTML.AllowedCommentsRegexp.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f22e977d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/htmlpurifier/library/HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/HTML.AllowedCommentsRegexp.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+HTML.AllowedCommentsRegexp
+TYPE: string/null
+VERSION: 4.4.0
+DEFAULT: NULL
+--DESCRIPTION--
+A regexp, which if it matches the body of a comment, indicates that
+it should be allowed. Trailing and leading spaces are removed prior
+to running this regular expression.
+<strong>Warning:</strong> Make sure you specify
+correct anchor metacharacters <code>^regex$</code>, otherwise you may accept
+comments that you did not mean to! In particular, the regex <code>/foo|bar/</code>
+is probably not sufficiently strict, since it also allows <code>foobar</code>.
+See also %HTML.AllowedComments (these directives are union'ed together,
+so a comment is considered valid if any directive deems it valid.)
+--# vim: et sw=4 sts=4
-- 
cgit v1.2.3