Where do strained U.S.-Israeli relations go after Netanyahu’s victory? -

-
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reacts as he visits the Western Wall in Jerusalem on March 18 following his party's victory in Israel's general election. (Thomas Coex/AFP/Getty Images) -

By Steven Mufson - March 18 at 12:22 PM - - Follow @StevenMufson -

President Obama told the U.N. General Assembly 18 months ago that he would - seek “real breakthroughs on these two issues — Iran’s nuclear program and - Israeli-Palestinian peace.”

But Benjamin Netanyahu’s triumph in Tuesday’s - parliamentary elections keeps in place an Israeli prime minister who has - declared his intention to resist Obama on both of these fronts, guaranteeing - two more years of difficult diplomacy between leaders who barely conceal - their personal distaste for each other.

The Israeli election results also suggest that most voters there support - Netanyahu’s tough stance on U.S.-led negotiations to limit Iran’s nuclear - program and his vow on Monday that there would be no independent Palestinian state as long - as he is prime minister.

“On the way to his election victory, Netanyahu broke a lot of crockery - in the relationship,” said Martin Indyk, executive vice president of the - Brookings Institution and a former U.S. ambassador to Israel. “It can’t - be repaired unless both sides have an interest and desire to do so.”

Aside from Russian President Vladimir Putin, few foreign leaders so brazenly - stand up to Obama and even fewer among longtime allies.

- -

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pledged to form a new governing coalition quickly after an upset election victory that was built on a shift to the right. (Reuters) -

In the past, Israeli leaders who risked damaging the country’s most important - relationship, that with Washington, tended to pay a price. In 1991, when - Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir opposed the Madrid peace talks, President - George H.W. Bush held back loan guarantees to help absorb immigrants from - the former Soviet Union. Shamir gave in, but his government soon collapsed.

But this time, Netanyahu was not hurt by his personal and substantive - conflicts with the U.S. president.

“While the United States is loved and beloved in Israel, President Obama - is not,” said Robert M. Danin, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign - Relations. “So the perceived enmity didn’t hurt the way it did with Shamir - when he ran afoul of Bush in ’91.”

Where do U.S.-Israeli relations go from here?

In the immediate aftermath of Tuesday’s elections, tensions between the - two sides continued to run hot. The Obama administration’s first comments - on the Israeli election came with a tough warning about some of the pre-election - rhetoric from Netanyahu’s Likud party, which tried to rally right-wing - support by saying that Arab Israeli voters were “coming out in droves.”

“The United States and this administration is deeply concerned about rhetoric - that seeks to marginalize Arab Israeli citizens,” White House press secretary - Josh Earnest told reporters aboard Air Force One. “It undermines the values - and democratic ideals that have been important to our democracy and an - important part of what binds the United States and Israel together.”

Earnest added that Netanyahu’s election-eve disavowal of a two-state - solution for Israelis and Palestinians would force the administration to - reconsider its approach to peace in the region.

Over the longer term, a number of analysts say that Obama and Netanyahu - will seek to play down the friction between them and point to areas of - continuing cooperation on military and economic issues.

“Both sides are going to want to turn down the rhetoric,” Danin said. - “But it is also a structural problem. They have six years of accumulated - history. That’s going to put limits on how far they can go together.”

The first substantive test could come as early as this month, when the - United States hopes that it can finish hammering out the framework of an - agreement with Iran.

Netanyahu strongly warned against making a “bad deal” during his March - 3 address to a joint meeting of Congress, an appearance arranged by Republican - congressional leaders and criticized by the Obama administration for making - U.S.-Israeli relations partisan on both sides so close to the Israeli election.

If a deal is reached and does not pass muster with Netanyahu, he is likely - to work with congressional Republicans to try to scuttle the accord.

“The Republicans have said they will do what they can to block a deal, - and the prime minister has already made clear that he will work with the - Republicans against the president,” Indyk said. “That’s where a clash could - come, and it’s coming very quickly.”

The second test — talks with Palestinians — could be even more difficult. - In his September 2013 address to the United Nations, Obama hailed signs - of hope.

“Already, Israeli and Palestinian leaders have demonstrated a willingness - to take significant political risks,” Obama said in his speech. Palestinian - Authority President Mahmoud Abbas “has put aside efforts to shortcut the - pursuit of peace and come to the negotiating table. Prime Minister Netanyahu - has released Palestinian prisoners and reaffirmed his commitment to a Palestinian - state.”

Today, the signals could not differ more. The - Palestinian Authority has said that after it joins the International Criminal - Court at The Hague on April 1, it will press war crimes charges against - Israel for the bloody Gaza conflict during the summer. Israel, which controls - tax receipts, has pledged to punish the Palestinian Authority by freezing - its tax revenue.

The United States, which gives hundreds of millions of dollars of economic - aid to the Palestinian Authority, would be caught in the middle. It has - been trying to persuade both sides to stand down, but Netanyahu’s declaration - that there would be no Palestinian state on his watch makes that more difficult.

“Now it’s hard to see what could persuade the Palestinians” to hold up - on their ICC plans, Indyk said. “That has nothing to do with negotiations, - but if both sides can’t be persuaded to back down, then they will be on - a trajectory that could lead to the collapse of the Palestinian Authority - because it can’t pay wages anymore.

“That could be an issue forced onto the agenda about the same time as - a potential nuclear deal.”

Steven Mufson covers the White House. Since joining The Post, he has covered - economics, China, foreign policy and energy.

Where do strained U.S.-Israeli relations go after Netanyahu’s victory?

Our Online Games

Sudoku

Genre(s):

Daily Crossword

Genre(s):

Just Words

Genre(s):

Trizzle

Genre(s):