Adjusted more result test cases

4 files changed, 76 insertions, 76 deletions

diff --git a/test/test-pages/embedded-videos/expected.html b/test/test-pages/embedded-videos/expected.html
index cb517c7..327e650 100644
--- a/test/test-pages/embedded-videos/expected.html
+++ b/test/test-pages/embedded-videos/expected.html
@@ -1,17 +1,25 @@
-    <article>
-        <p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.</p>
-        <h2>Videos</h2>
-        <p>At root</p>
-        <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LtOGa5M8AuU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>
-        <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/LtOGa5M8AuU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>
-        <iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/32246206?color=ffffff+title=0+byline=0+portrait=0" width="500" height="281" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen="" mozallowfullscreen="" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>
-        <p>In a paragraph</p>
-        <p>
-            <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/LtOGa5M8AuU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>
-        </p>
-        <p>In a div</p>
-        <p>
-            <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LtOGa5M8AuU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>
-        </p>
-        <h2>Foo</h2>
-        <p> Tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. </p>
\ No newline at end of file
+<article>
+    <p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
+      tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam,
+      quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo
+      consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse
+      cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non
+      proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.</p>
+    <h2>Videos</h2>
+    <p>At root</p>
+    <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LtOGa5M8AuU" width="560"></iframe>
+    <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/LtOGa5M8AuU" width="560"></iframe>
+    <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="281" mozallowfullscreen="" src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/32246206?color=ffffff+title=0+byline=0+portrait=0" webkitallowfullscreen="" width="500"></iframe>
+    <p>In a paragraph</p>
+    <p><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/LtOGa5M8AuU" width="560"></iframe></p>
+    <p>In a div</p>
+    <p><iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LtOGa5M8AuU" width="560"></iframe></p>
+    <h2>Foo</h2>
+    <p>
+      Tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam,
+      quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo
+      consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse
+      cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non
+      proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
+    </p>
+  </article>
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/test/test-pages/herald-sun-1/expected.html b/test/test-pages/herald-sun-1/expected.html
index a60d2b2..634db54 100644
--- a/test/test-pages/herald-sun-1/expected.html
+++ b/test/test-pages/herald-sun-1/expected.html
@@ -1,33 +1,27 @@
-    <div class="story-body ">
-        <div class="article-media article-media-main">
-            <div class="image">
-                <div class="image-frame"><img data-src="http://api.news.com.au/content/1.0/heraldsun/images/1227261885862?format=jpg&amp;group=iphone&amp;size=medium" alt="A new Bill would require telecommunications service providers to store so-called ‘metadat"/></div>
-                <p class="caption"> <span id="imgCaption" class="caption-text">A new Bill would require telecommunications service providers to store so-called ‘metadata’ for two years.</span> <span class="image-source"><em>Source:</em>
-											Supplied</span> </p>
-            </div>
-        </div>
-        <p><strong>
+<div class="story-body ">
+		<div class="article-media article-media-main">
+								<div class="image">
+									<div class="image-frame">
+										<img alt="A new Bill would require telecommunications service providers to store so-called ‘metadat" data-src="http://api.news.com.au/content/1.0/heraldsun/images/1227261885862?format=jpg&amp;group=iphone&amp;size=medium"></img></div>
+										<p class="caption">
+											<span class="caption-text" id="imgCaption">A new Bill would require telecommunications service providers to store so-called ‘metadata’ for two years.</span>
+											<span class="image-source"><em>Source:</em>
+											Supplied</span>
+										</p>
+								</div>
+		</div>
+			<p><strong>
 				A HIGH-powered federal government team has been doing the rounds of media organisations in the past few days in an attempt to allay concerns about the impact of new surveillance legislation on press freedom. It failed.
 				</strong></p>
-        <p>The roadshow featured the Prime Minister’s national security adviser, Andrew Shearer, Justin Bassi, who advises Attorney-General George Brandis on crime and security matters, and Australian Federal Police Commissioner Andrew Colvin. Staffers from the office of Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull also took part.</p>
-        <p>They held meetings with executives from News Corporation and Fairfax, representatives of the TV networks, the ABC top brass and a group from the media union and the Walkley journalism foundation. I was involved as a member of the Walkley board.</p>
-        <p>The initiative, from Tony Abbott’s office, is evidence that the Government has been alarmed by the strength of criticism from media of the Data Retention Bill it wants passed before Parliament rises in a fortnight. Bosses, journalists, even the Press Council, are up in arms, not only over this measure, but also over aspects of two earlier pieces of national security legislation that interfere with the ability of the media to hold government to account.</p>
-        <div id="read-more">
-            <div id="read-more-content">
-                <p>The Bill would require telecommunications service providers to store so-called “metadata” — the who, where, when and how of a communication, but not its content — for two years so security and law enforcement agencies can access it without warrant. Few would argue against the use of such material to catch criminals or terrorists. But, as Parliament’s Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has pointed out, it would also be used “for the purpose of determining the identity of a journalist’s sources”.</p>
-                <p>And that should ring warning bells for anyone genuinely concerned with the health of our democracy. Without the ability to protect the identity of sources, journalists would be greatly handicapped in exposing corruption, dishonesty, waste, incompetence and misbehaviour by public officials.</p>
-                <p>The Press Council is concerned the laws would crush investigative journalism.</p>
-                <p>“These legitimate concerns cannot be addressed effectively short of exempting journalists and media organisations,” says president David Weisbrot.</p>
-                <p>The media union is adamant journalists’ metadata must be exempted from the law. That’s what media bosses want, too, though they have a fallback position based on new safeguards being implemented in Britain.</p>
-                <p>That would prevent access to the metadata of journalists or media organisations without a judicial warrant. There would be a code including — according to the explanatory notes of the British Bill — “provision to protect the public interest in the confidentiality of journalistic sources”.</p>
-                <p>In their meetings this week, the government team boasted of concessions in the new Data Retention Bill. The number of agencies able to access metadata will be reduced by excluding such organisations as the RSPCA and local councils. And whenever an authorisation is issued for access to information about a journalist’s sources, the Ombudsman (or, where ASIO is involved, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security) will receive a copy.</p>
-                <p>That does nothing to solve the problem. The Government has effectively admitted as much by agreeing that the parliamentary committee should conduct a separate review of how to deal with the issue of journalists’ sources.</p>
-                <p>But another inquiry would be a waste of time — the committee has already received and considered dozens of submissions on the subject. The bottom line is that the Government does not deny that the legislation is flawed, but is demanding it be passed anyway with the possibility left open of a repair job down the track. That is a ridiculous approach.</p>
-                <p>Claims that immediate action is imperative do not stand up. These are measures that won’t come into full effect for two years. Anyway, amending the Bill to either exempt journalists or adopt the UK model could be done quickly, without any risk to national security.</p>
-                <p>AS Opposition Leader Bill Shorten said in a letter to Abbott last month: “Press freedom concerns about mandatory data retention would ideally be addressed in this Bill to avoid the need for future additional amendments or procedures to be put in place in the future.”</p>
-                <p>The Data Retention Bill will be debated in the House of Representatives this week. Then, on Friday, CEOs from leading media organisations will front the parliamentary committee to air their concerns before the legislation goes to the Senate.</p>
-                <p>Those CEOs should make it clear they are just as angry about this as they were about Stephen Conroy’s attempt to impinge on press freedom through media regulation under the previous Labor government.</p>
-                <p>Memories of the grief Conroy brought down on his head would undoubtedly make Abbott sit up and take notice.</p>
-                <p><b>LAURIE OAKES IS THE NINE NETWORK POLITICAL EDITOR </b></p>
-            </div>
-        </div>
\ No newline at end of file
+		<p>The roadshow featured the Prime Minister’s national security adviser, Andrew Shearer, Justin Bassi, who advises Attorney-General George Brandis on crime and security matters, and Australian Federal Police Commissioner Andrew Colvin. Staffers from the office of Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull also took part.</p><p>They held meetings with executives from News Corporation and Fairfax, representatives of the TV networks, the ABC top brass and a group from the media union and the Walkley journalism foundation. I was involved as a member of the Walkley board.</p><p>The initiative, from Tony Abbott’s office, is evidence that the Government has been alarmed by the strength of criticism from media of the Data Retention Bill it wants passed before Parliament rises in a fortnight. Bosses, journalists, even the Press Council, are up in arms, not only over this measure, but also over aspects of two earlier pieces of national security legislation that interfere with the ability of the media to hold government to account.</p>
+		
+				
+		  
+<div id="read-more">
+    
+    
+    <div id="read-more-content">
+        <p>The Bill would require telecommunications service providers to store so-called “metadata” — the who, where, when and how of a communication, but not its content — for two years so security and law enforcement agencies can access it without warrant. Few would argue against the use of such material to catch criminals or terrorists. But, as Parliament’s Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has pointed out, it would also be used “for the purpose of determining the identity of a journalist’s sources”.</p><p>And that should ring warning bells for anyone genuinely concerned with the health of our democracy. Without the ability to protect the identity of sources, journalists would be greatly handicapped in exposing corruption, dishonesty, waste, incompetence and misbehaviour by public officials.</p><p>The Press Council is concerned the laws would crush investigative journalism.</p><p>“These legitimate concerns cannot be addressed effectively short of exempting journalists and media organisations,” says president David Weisbrot.</p><p>The media union is adamant journalists’ metadata must be exempted from the law. That’s what media bosses want, too, though they have a fallback position based on new safeguards being implemented in Britain.</p><p>That would prevent access to the metadata of journalists or media organisations without a judicial warrant. There would be a code including — according to the explanatory notes of the British Bill — “provision to protect the public interest in the confidentiality of journalistic sources”.</p><p>In their meetings this week, the government team boasted of concessions in the new Data Retention Bill. The number of agencies able to access metadata will be reduced by excluding such organisations as the RSPCA and local councils. And whenever an authorisation is issued for access to information about a journalist’s sources, the Ombudsman (or, where ASIO is involved, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security) will receive a copy.</p><p>That does nothing to solve the problem. The Government has effectively admitted as much by agreeing that the parliamentary committee should conduct a separate review of how to deal with the issue of journalists’ sources.</p><p>But another inquiry would be a waste of time — the committee has already received and considered dozens of submissions on the subject. The bottom line is that the Government does not deny that the legislation is flawed, but is demanding it be passed anyway with the possibility left open of a repair job down the track. That is a ridiculous approach.</p><p>Claims that immediate action is imperative do not stand up. These are measures that won’t come into full effect for two years. Anyway, amending the Bill to either exempt journalists or adopt the UK model could be done quickly, without any risk to national security.</p><p>AS Opposition Leader Bill Shorten said in a letter to Abbott last month: “Press freedom concerns about mandatory data retention would ideally be addressed in this Bill to avoid the need for future additional amendments or procedures to be put in place in the future.”</p><p>The Data Retention Bill will be debated in the House of Representatives this week. Then, on Friday, CEOs from leading media organisations will front the parliamentary committee to air their concerns before the legislation goes to the Senate.</p><p>Those CEOs should make it clear they are just as angry about this as they were about Stephen Conroy’s attempt to impinge on press freedom through media regulation under the previous Labor government.</p><p>Memories of the grief Conroy brought down on his head would undoubtedly make Abbott sit up and take notice.</p><p><b>LAURIE OAKES IS THE NINE NETWORK POLITICAL EDITOR </b></p>
+    </div>
+</div>
+</div>
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/test/test-pages/iab-1/expected.html b/test/test-pages/iab-1/expected.html
index 091c879..5a44e52 100644
--- a/test/test-pages/iab-1/expected.html
+++ b/test/test-pages/iab-1/expected.html
@@ -1,27 +1,22 @@
-    <div class="article__content">
-        <p>We messed up. As technologists, tasked with delivering content and services to users, we lost track of the user experience.</p>
-        <p>Twenty years ago we saw an explosion of websites, built by developers around the world, providing all forms of content. This was the beginning of an age of enlightenment, the intersection of content and technology. Many of us in the technical field felt compelled, and even empowered, to produce information as the distribution means for mass communication were no longer restricted by a high barrier to entry.</p>
-        <p>In 2000, the dark ages came when the dot-com bubble burst. We were told that our startups were gone or that our divisions sustained by corporate parent companies needed to be in the black. It was a wakeup call that led to a renaissance age. Digital advertising became the foundation of an economic engine that, still now, sustains the free and democratic World Wide Web. In digital publishing, we strived to balance content, commerce, and technology. The content management systems and communication gateways we built to inform and entertain populations around the world disrupted markets and in some cases governments, informed communities of imminent danger, and liberated new forms of art and entertainment—all while creating a digital middle class of small businesses.</p>
-        <p>We engineered not just the technical, but also the social and economic foundation that users around the world came to lean on for access to real time information. And users came to expect this information whenever and wherever they needed it. And more often than not, for anybody with a connected device, it was free.</p>
-        <p>This was choice—powered by digital advertising—and premised on user experience.</p>
-        <p>But we messed up.</p>
-        <p>Through our pursuit of further automation and maximization of margins during the industrial age of media technology, we built advertising technology to optimize publishers’ yield of marketing budgets that had eroded after the last recession. Looking back now, our scraping of dimes may have cost us dollars in consumer loyalty. The fast, scalable systems of targeting users with ever-heftier advertisements have slowed down the public internet and drained more than a few batteries. We were so clever and so good at it that we over-engineered the capabilities of the plumbing laid down by, well, ourselves. This steamrolled the users, depleted their devices, and tried their patience.</p>
-        <p>The rise of ad blocking poses a threat to the internet and could potentially drive users to an enclosed platform world dominated by a few companies. We have let the fine equilibrium of content, commerce, and technology get out of balance in the open web. We had, and still do have, a responsibility to educate the business side, and in some cases to push back. We lost sight of our social and ethical responsibility to provide a safe, usable experience for anyone and everyone wanting to consume the content of their choice.</p>
-        <p>We need to bring that back into alignment, starting right now.</p>
-        <p>
-            <a href="http://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/getting-lean-with-digital-ad-ux.jpg"><img width="300" height="250" alt="Getting LEAN with Digital Ad UX" src="http://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/getting-lean-with-digital-ad-ux-300x250.jpg" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-15403"/></a>Today, the IAB Tech Lab is launching the L.E.A.N. Ads program. Supported by the Executive Committee of the IAB Tech Lab Board, IABs around the world, and hundreds of member companies, L.E.A.N. stands for Light, Encrypted, Ad choice supported, Non-invasive ads. These are principles that will help guide the next phases of advertising technical standards for the global digital advertising supply chain.</p>
-        <p>As with any other industry, standards should be created by non-profit standards-setting bodies, with many diverse voices providing input. We will invite all parties for public comment, and make sure consumer interest groups have the opportunity to provide input.</p>
-        <p>L.E.A.N. Ads do not replace the current advertising standards many consumers still enjoy and engage with while consuming content on our sites across all IP enabled devices. Rather, these principles will guide an alternative set of standards that provide choice for marketers, content providers, and consumers.</p>
-        <p>Among the many areas of concentration, we must also address frequency capping on retargeting in Ad Tech and make sure a user is targeted appropriately before, but never AFTER they make a purchase. If we are so good at reach and scale, we can be just as good, if not better, at moderation. Additionally, we must address volume of ads per page as well as continue on the path to viewability. The dependencies here are critical to an optimized user experience.</p>
-        <p>The consumer is demanding these actions, challenging us to do better, and we must respond.</p>
-        <p>The IAB Tech Lab will continue to provide the tools for publishers in the digital supply chain to have a dialogue with users about their choices so that content providers can generate revenue while creating value. Publishers should have the opportunity to provide rich advertising experiences, L.E.A.N. advertising experiences, and subscription services. Or publishers can simply deny their service to users who choose to keep on blocking ads. That is all part of elasticity of consumer tolerance and choice.</p>
-        <p>Finally, we must do this in an increasingly fragmented market, across screens. We must do this in environments where entire sites are blocked, purposefully or not. Yes, it is disappointing that our development efforts will have to manage with multiple frameworks while we work to supply the economic engine to sustain an open internet. However, our goal is still to provide diverse content and voices to as many connected users as possible around the world.</p>
-        <p>That is user experience.</p>
-        <table>
-            <tbody>
-                <tr>
-                    <td>IAB Tech Lab Members can join the IAB Tech Lab Ad Blocking Working Group, please email <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> for more information.</td>
-                </tr>
-            </tbody>
-        </table>
-        <p>Read <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iab.com/insights/ad-blocking/">more about ad blocking here</a>.</p>
\ No newline at end of file
+<div class="article__content">
+			<p>We messed up. As technologists, tasked with delivering content and services to users, we lost track of the user experience.</p>
+<p>Twenty years ago we saw an explosion of websites, built by developers around the world, providing all forms of content. This was the beginning of an age of enlightenment, the intersection of content and technology. Many of us in the technical field felt compelled, and even empowered, to produce information as the distribution means for mass communication were no longer restricted by a high barrier to entry.</p>
+<p>In 2000, the dark ages came when the dot-com bubble burst. We were told that our startups were gone or that our divisions sustained by corporate parent companies needed to be in the black. It was a wakeup call that led to a renaissance age. Digital advertising became the foundation of an economic engine that, still now, sustains the free and democratic World Wide Web. In digital publishing, we strived to balance content, commerce, and technology. The content management systems and communication gateways we built to inform and entertain populations around the world disrupted markets and in some cases governments, informed communities of imminent danger, and liberated new forms of art and entertainment—all while creating a digital middle class of small businesses.</p>
+<p>We engineered not just the technical, but also the social and economic foundation that users around the world came to lean on for access to real time information. And users came to expect this information whenever and wherever they needed it. And more often than not, for anybody with a connected device, it was free.</p>
+<p>This was choice—powered by digital advertising—and premised on user experience.</p>
+<p>But we messed up.</p>
+<p>Through our pursuit of further automation and maximization of margins during the industrial age of media technology, we built advertising technology to optimize publishers’ yield of marketing budgets that had eroded after the last recession. Looking back now, our scraping of dimes may have cost us dollars in consumer loyalty. The fast, scalable systems of targeting users with ever-heftier advertisements have slowed down the public internet and drained more than a few batteries. We were so clever and so good at it that we over-engineered the capabilities of the plumbing laid down by, well, ourselves. This steamrolled the users, depleted their devices, and tried their patience.</p>
+<p>The rise of ad blocking poses a threat to the internet and could potentially drive users to an enclosed platform world dominated by a few companies. We have let the fine equilibrium of content, commerce, and technology get out of balance in the open web. We had, and still do have, a responsibility to educate the business side, and in some cases to push back. We lost sight of our social and ethical responsibility to provide a safe, usable experience for anyone and everyone wanting to consume the content of their choice.</p>
+<p>We need to bring that back into alignment, starting right now.</p>
+<p><a href="http://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/getting-lean-with-digital-ad-ux.jpg"><img alt="Getting LEAN with Digital Ad UX" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-15403" height="250" src="http://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/getting-lean-with-digital-ad-ux-300x250.jpg" width="300"></img></a>Today, the IAB Tech Lab is launching the L.E.A.N. Ads program. Supported by the Executive Committee of the IAB Tech Lab Board, IABs around the world, and hundreds of member companies, L.E.A.N. stands for Light, Encrypted, Ad choice supported, Non-invasive ads. These are principles that will help guide the next phases of advertising technical standards for the global digital advertising supply chain.</p>
+<p>As with any other industry, standards should be created by non-profit standards-setting bodies, with many diverse voices providing input. We will invite all parties for public comment, and make sure consumer interest groups have the opportunity to provide input.</p>
+<p>L.E.A.N. Ads do not replace the current advertising standards many consumers still enjoy and engage with while consuming content on our sites across all IP enabled devices. Rather, these principles will guide an alternative set of standards that provide choice for marketers, content providers, and consumers.</p>
+<p>Among the many areas of concentration, we must also address frequency capping on retargeting in Ad Tech and make sure a user is targeted appropriately before, but never AFTER they make a purchase. If we are so good at reach and scale, we can be just as good, if not better, at moderation. Additionally, we must address volume of ads per page as well as continue on the path to viewability. The dependencies here are critical to an optimized user experience.</p>
+<p>The consumer is demanding these actions, challenging us to do better, and we must respond.</p>
+<p>The IAB Tech Lab will continue to provide the tools for publishers in the digital supply chain to have a dialogue with users about their choices so that content providers can generate revenue while creating value. Publishers should have the opportunity to provide rich advertising experiences, L.E.A.N. advertising experiences, and subscription services. Or publishers can simply deny their service to users who choose to keep on blocking ads. That is all part of elasticity of consumer tolerance and choice.</p>
+<p>Finally, we must do this in an increasingly fragmented market, across screens. We must do this in environments where entire sites are blocked, purposefully or not. Yes, it is disappointing that our development efforts will have to manage with multiple frameworks while we work to supply the economic engine to sustain an open internet. However, our goal is still to provide diverse content and voices to as many connected users as possible around the world.</p>
+<p>That is user experience.</p>
+<p> </p>
+<table style="background-color: #cccccc;"><tbody><tr><td>IAB Tech Lab Members can join the IAB Tech Lab Ad Blocking Working Group, please email <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> for more information.</td>
+</tr></tbody></table><p>Read <a href="http://www.iab.com/insights/ad-blocking/" target="_blank">more about ad blocking here</a>.</p>
+					</div>
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/test/test-pages/ietf-1/expected.html b/test/test-pages/ietf-1/expected.html
index e9e2207..5ce872f 100644
--- a/test/test-pages/ietf-1/expected.html
+++ b/test/test-pages/ietf-1/expected.html
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+<span class="pre noprint docinfo top">[<a href="http://fakehost/test/../html/" title="Document search and retrieval page">Docs</a>] [<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-dejong-remotestorage-04.txt" title="Plaintext version of this document">txt</a>|<a href="http://fakehost/pdf/draft-dejong-remotestorage-04.txt" title="PDF version of this document">pdf</a>] [<a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dejong-remotestorage" title="IESG Datatracker information for this document">Tracker</a>] [<a href="mailto:[email protected]?subject=draft-dejong-remotestorage%20" title="Send email to the document authors">Email</a>] [<a href="http://fakehost/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&amp;url2=draft-dejong-remotestorage-04.txt" title="Inline diff (wdiff)">Diff1</a>] [<a href="http://fakehost/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dejong-remotestorage-04.txt" title="Side-by-side diff">Diff2</a>] [<a href="http://fakehost/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-dejong-remotestorage-04.txt" title="Run an idnits check of this document">Nits</a>]               </span>
     <br/> <span class="pre noprint docinfo">                                                                        </span>
     <br/> <span class="pre noprint docinfo">Versions: <a href="http://fakehost/test/draft-dejong-remotestorage-00">00</a> <a href="http://fakehost/test/draft-dejong-remotestorage-01">01</a> <a href="http://fakehost/test/draft-dejong-remotestorage-02">02</a> <a href="http://fakehost/test/draft-dejong-remotestorage-03">03</a> <a href="http://fakehost/test/draft-dejong-remotestorage-04">04</a>                                                </span>
     <br/> <span class="pre noprint docinfo">                                                                        </span>
@@ -1106,4 +1107,6 @@ charset=UTF-8","Content-Length":106}}}
 de Jong                                                        [Page 22]
 
 </pre>
-    <br/> <span class="noprint"><small><small>Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.111, available from
\ No newline at end of file
+    <br/> <span class="noprint"><small><small>Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.111, available from
+<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/">https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/</a>
+</small></small></span>
\ No newline at end of file