diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'test/test-pages/lwn-1/expected.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | test/test-pages/lwn-1/expected.html | 28 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/test/test-pages/lwn-1/expected.html b/test/test-pages/lwn-1/expected.html index e16c0cd..76e5db3 100644 --- a/test/test-pages/lwn-1/expected.html +++ b/test/test-pages/lwn-1/expected.html @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ <div><td> - + <div> <h2><a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637755/">A trademark battle in the Arduino community</a></h2> - + <p>The <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arduino">Arduino</a> has been one of the biggest success stories of the open-hardware movement, but that success does not protect it from internal conflict. In recent months, two of the project's founders have come into conflict about the direction of future efforts—and that conflict has turned into a legal dispute about who owns the rights to the Arduino trademark. </p> <p>The current fight is a battle between two companies that both bear the Arduino name: Arduino LLC and Arduino SRL. The disagreements that led to present state of affairs go back a bit further. </p> <p>The Arduino project grew out of 2005-era course work taught at the Interaction Design Institute Ivrea (IDII) in Ivrea, Italy (using <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Processing_(programming_language)">Processing</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiring_%28development_platform%29">Wiring</a>, and pre-existing microcontroller hardware). After the IDII program was discontinued, the open-hardware Arduino project as we know it was launched by Massimo Banzi, David Cuartielles, and David Mellis (who had worked together at IDII), with co-founders Tom Igoe and Gianluca Martino joining shortly afterward. The project released open hardware designs (including full schematics and design files) as well as the microcontroller software to run on the boards and the desktop IDE needed to program it. </p> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ program</a> for third-party manufacturers interested in using the "Arduino" bran <p>One could argue that disputes of this sort are proof that even small projects started among friends need to take legal and intellectual-property issues (such as trademarks) seriously from the very beginning—perhaps Arduino and Smart Projects thought that an informal agreement was all that was necessary in the early days, after all. </p> <p>But, perhaps, once a project becomes profitable, there is simply no way to predict what might happen. Arduino LLC would seem to have a strong case for continual and rigorous use of the "Arduino" trademark, which is the salient point in US trademark law. It could still be a while before the courts rule on either side of that question, however. </p> <p><a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637755/#Comments">Comments (5 posted)</a> </p> - + <h2><a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637533/">Mapping and data mining with QGIS 2.8</a></h2> <p> By <b>Nathan Willis</b> <br></br>March 25, 2015 </p> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ curves</a>, refactoring data sets, and more. </p> <p>There are, as usual, many more changes than there is room to discuss. Some particularly noteworthy improvements include the ability to save and load bookmarks for frequently used data sources (perhaps most useful for databases, web services, and other non-local data) and improvements to QGIS's server module. This module allows one QGIS instance to serve up data accessible to other QGIS applications (for example, to simply team projects). The server can now be extended with Python plugins and the data layers that it serves can be styled with style rules like those used in the desktop interface. </p> <p>QGIS is one of those rare free-software applications that is both powerful enough for high-end work and yet also straightforward to use for the simple tasks that might attract a newcomer to GIS in the first place. The 2.8 release, particularly with its project-wide commitment to long-term support, appears to be an update well worth checking out, whether one needs to create a simple, custom map or to mine a database for obscure geo-referenced meaning. </p> <p><a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637533/#Comments">Comments (3 posted)</a> </p> - + <h2><a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637735/">Development activity in LibreOffice and OpenOffice</a></h2> <p> By <b>Jonathan Corbet</b> <br></br>March 25, 2015 </p><p> The LibreOffice project was <a href="http://fakehost/Articles/407383/">announced</a> with great fanfare in September 2010. Nearly one year later, the OpenOffice.org project (from which LibreOffice was forked) <a href="http://fakehost/Articles/446093/">was @@ -61,14 +61,14 @@ cut loose from Oracle</a> and found a new home as an Apache project. It is fair <h4>Release histories</h4> <p> Apache OpenOffice has made two releases in the past year: <a href="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/the_apache_openoffice_project_announce">4.1</a> in April 2014 and <a href="https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/announcing_apache_openoffice_4_1">4.1.1</a> (described as "a micro update" in the release announcement) in August. The main feature added during that time would appear to be significantly improved accessibility support. </p> <p> The release history for LibreOffice tells a slightly different story: </p> - + <blockquote> </blockquote> <p> It seems clear that LibreOffice has maintained a rather more frenetic release cadence, generally putting out at least one release per month. The project typically keeps at least two major versions alive at any one time. Most of the releases are of the minor, bug-fix variety, but there have been two major releases in the last year as well. </p> - + <h4>Development statistics</h4> <p> In the one-year period since late March 2014, there have been 381 changesets committed to the OpenOffice Subversion repository. The most active committers are: </p> - + <blockquote> <table><tbody><tr><th colspan="2">Most active OpenOffice developers</th> </tr><tr><td> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ cut loose from Oracle</a> and found a new home as an Apache project. It is fair <p> In truth, the above list is not just the most active OpenOffice developers — it is all of them; a total of 16 developers have committed changes to OpenOffice in the last year. Those developers changed 528,000 lines of code, but, as can be seen above, Jürgen Schmidt accounted for the bulk of those changes, which were mostly updates to translation files. </p> <p> The top four developers in the "by changesets" column all work for IBM, so IBM is responsible for a minimum of about 60% of the changes to OpenOffice in the last year. </p> <p> The picture for LibreOffice is just a little bit different; in the same one-year period, the project has committed 22,134 changesets from 268 developers. The most active of these developers were: </p> - + <blockquote> <table><tbody><tr><th colspan="2">Most active LibreOffice developers</th> </tr><tr><td> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ cut loose from Oracle</a> and found a new home as an Apache project. It is fair </tr></tbody></table></td> </tr></tbody></table></blockquote> <p> To a first approximation, the top ten companies supporting LibreOffice in the last year are: </p> - + <blockquote> <table><tbody><tr><th colspan="3">Companies supporting LibreOffice development</th> </tr><tr><th colspan="3">(by changesets)</th> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ cut loose from Oracle</a> and found a new home as an Apache project. It is fair <td>0.0%</td> </tr></tbody></table></blockquote> <p> Development work on LibreOffice is thus concentrated in a small number of companies, though it is rather more spread out than OpenOffice development. It is worth noting that the LibreOffice developers with unknown affiliation, who contributed 23% of the changes, make up 82% of the developer base, so there would appear to be a substantial community of developers contributing from outside the above-listed companies. </p> - + <h4>Some conclusions</h4> <p> Last October, some <a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637742/">concerns</a> were raised on the OpenOffice list about the health of that project's community. At the time, Rob Weir <a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637743/">shrugged them off</a> as the result of a marketing effort by the LibreOffice crowd. There can be no doubt that the war of words between these two projects has gotten tiresome at times, but, looking at the above numbers, it is hard not to conclude that there is an issue that goes beyond marketing hype here. </p> <p> In the 4½ years since its founding, the LibreOffice project has put together a community with over 250 active developers. There is support from multiple companies and an impressive rate of patches going into the project's repository. The project's ability to sustain nearly monthly releases on two branches is a direct result of that community's work. Swearing at LibreOffice is one of your editor's favorite pastimes, but it seems clear that the project is on a solid footing with a healthy community. </p> @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ blog</a> shows no posts in 2015. In the October discussion, Rob <a href="http:// bark but the caravan moves on.</span>" That may be true, but, in this case, the caravan does not appear to be moving with any great speed. </p> <p> Anything can happen in the free-software development world; it is entirely possible that a reinvigorated OpenOffice.org may yet give LibreOffice a run for its money. But something will clearly have to change to bring that future around. As things stand now, it is hard not to conclude that LibreOffice has won the battle for developer participation. </p> <p><a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637735/#Comments">Comments (74 posted)</a> </p> - + <p> <b>Page editor</b>: Jonathan Corbet <br></br></p> <h2>Inside this week's LWN.net Weekly Edition</h2> @@ -364,10 +364,10 @@ bark but the caravan moves on.</span>" That may be true, but, in this case, the <li> <a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637399/">Announcements</a>: A Turing award for Michael Stonebraker, Sébastien Jodogne, ReGlue are Free Software Award winners, Kat Walsh joins FSF board of directors, Cyanogen, ... </li> </ul><p><b>Next page</b>: <a href="http://fakehost/Articles/637395/">Security>></a> <br></br></p></div> - + </td> - + <td> - + </td> </div>
\ No newline at end of file |