diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'plugins/af_readability/vendor/fivefilters/readability.php/test/test-pages/wapo-2/expected.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/af_readability/vendor/fivefilters/readability.php/test/test-pages/wapo-2/expected.html | 103 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 103 deletions
diff --git a/plugins/af_readability/vendor/fivefilters/readability.php/test/test-pages/wapo-2/expected.html b/plugins/af_readability/vendor/fivefilters/readability.php/test/test-pages/wapo-2/expected.html deleted file mode 100644 index d87cb3755..000000000 --- a/plugins/af_readability/vendor/fivefilters/readability.php/test/test-pages/wapo-2/expected.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,103 +0,0 @@ -<p><a name="1c164a7079bfe20ebd611d79f96418b5a225cbc6"></a> - <img src="https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_400w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2015/03/18/National-Economy/Images/Nic6429750-1140.jpg?uuid=zLIZQs2KEeSip5UXo6cFBg" data-hi-res-src="https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_1484w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2015/03/18/National-Economy/Images/Nic6429750-1140.jpg?uuid=zLIZQs2KEeSip5UXo6cFBg" data-low-res-src="https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_400w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2015/03/18/National-Economy/Images/Nic6429750-1140.jpg?uuid=zLIZQs2KEeSip5UXo6cFBg"> - <br> <span>Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reacts as he visits the Western Wall in Jerusalem on March 18 following his party's victory in Israel's general election. (Thomas Coex/AFP/Getty Images)</span> - </p><article> - <p>President Obama told the U.N. General Assembly 18 months ago that he would - seek “real breakthroughs on these two issues — Iran’s nuclear program and - Israeli-Palestinian peace.”</p> - <p>But <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/netanyahu-sweeps-to-victory-in-israeli-election/2015/03/18/af4e50ca-ccf2-11e4-8730-4f473416e759_story.html" title="www.washingtonpost.com">Benjamin Netanyahu’s triumph</a> in Tuesday’s - parliamentary elections keeps in place an Israeli prime minister who has - declared his intention to resist Obama on both of these fronts, guaranteeing - two more years of difficult diplomacy between leaders who barely conceal - their personal distaste for each other.</p> - <p>The Israeli election results also suggest that most voters there support - Netanyahu’s tough stance on U.S.-led negotiations to limit Iran’s nuclear - program and his vow on Monday that there would be <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/on-final-day-of-campaign-netanyahu-says-no-palestinian-state-if-he-wins/2015/03/16/4f4468e8-cbdc-11e4-8730-4f473416e759_story.html" title="www.washingtonpost.com">no independent Palestinian state</a> as long - as he is prime minister.</p> - <p>“On the way to his election victory, Netanyahu broke a lot of crockery - in the relationship,” said Martin Indyk, executive vice president of the - Brookings Institution and a former U.S. ambassador to Israel. “It can’t - be repaired unless both sides have an interest and desire to do so.”</p> - <p>Aside from Russian President Vladimir Putin, few foreign leaders so brazenly - stand up to Obama and even fewer among longtime allies.</p> - <div> - - <p><span>Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pledged to form a new governing coalition quickly after an upset election victory that was built on a shift to the right. (Reuters)</span> - </p> - </div> - <p>In the past, Israeli leaders who risked damaging the country’s most important - relationship, that with Washington, tended to pay a price. In 1991, when - Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir opposed the Madrid peace talks, President - George H.W. Bush held back loan guarantees to help absorb immigrants from - the former Soviet Union. Shamir gave in, but his government soon collapsed.</p> - <p>But this time, Netanyahu was not hurt by his personal and substantive - conflicts with the U.S. president.</p> - <p>“While the United States is loved and beloved in Israel, President Obama - is not,” said Robert M. Danin, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign - Relations. “So the perceived enmity didn’t hurt the way it did with Shamir - when he ran afoul of Bush in ’91.”</p> - <p>Where do U.S.-Israeli relations go from here?</p> - <p>In the immediate aftermath of Tuesday’s elections, tensions between the - two sides continued to run hot. The Obama administration’s first comments - on the Israeli election came with a tough warning about some of the pre-election - rhetoric from Netanyahu’s Likud party, which tried to rally right-wing - support by saying that Arab Israeli voters were “coming out in droves.”</p> - <p>“The United States and this administration is deeply concerned about rhetoric - that seeks to marginalize Arab Israeli citizens,” White House press secretary - Josh Earnest told reporters aboard Air Force One. “It undermines the values - and democratic ideals that have been important to our democracy and an - important part of what binds the United States and Israel together.”</p> - <p>Earnest added that Netanyahu’s election-eve disavowal of a two-state - solution for Israelis and Palestinians would force the administration to - reconsider its approach to peace in the region.</p> - - <p>Over the longer term, a number of analysts say that Obama and Netanyahu - will seek to play down the friction between them and point to areas of - continuing cooperation on military and economic issues.</p> - <p>“Both sides are going to want to turn down the rhetoric,” Danin said. - “But it is also a structural problem. They have six years of accumulated - history. That’s going to put limits on how far they can go together.”</p> - <p>The first substantive test could come as early as this month, when the - United States hopes that it can finish hammering out the framework of an - agreement with Iran.</p> - <p>Netanyahu strongly warned against making a “bad deal” during his March - 3 address to a joint meeting of Congress, an appearance arranged by Republican - congressional leaders and criticized by the Obama administration for making - U.S.-Israeli relations partisan on both sides so close to the Israeli election.</p> - <p>If a deal is reached and does not pass muster with Netanyahu, he is likely - to work with congressional Republicans to try to scuttle the accord.</p> - <p>“The Republicans have said they will do what they can to block a deal, - and the prime minister has already made clear that he will work with the - Republicans against the president,” Indyk said. “That’s where a clash could - come, and it’s coming very quickly.”</p> - <p>The second test — talks with Palestinians — could be even more difficult. - In his September 2013 address to the United Nations, Obama hailed signs - of hope.</p> - <p>“Already, Israeli and Palestinian leaders have demonstrated a willingness - to take significant political risks,” Obama said in his speech. Palestinian - Authority President Mahmoud Abbas “has put aside efforts to shortcut the - pursuit of peace and come to the negotiating table. Prime Minister Netanyahu - has released Palestinian prisoners and reaffirmed his commitment to a Palestinian - state.”</p> - <p>Today, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2015/03/18/what-netanyahus-election-victory-means-for-the-palestinians/" title="www.washingtonpost.com">the signals could not differ more</a>. The - Palestinian Authority has said that after it joins the International Criminal - Court at The Hague on April 1, it will press war crimes charges against - Israel for the bloody Gaza conflict during the summer. Israel, which controls - tax receipts, has pledged to punish the Palestinian Authority by freezing - its tax revenue.</p> - <p>The United States, which gives hundreds of millions of dollars of economic - aid to the Palestinian Authority, would be caught in the middle. It has - been trying to persuade both sides to stand down, but Netanyahu’s declaration - that there would be no Palestinian state on his watch makes that more difficult.</p> - <p>“Now it’s hard to see what could persuade the Palestinians” to hold up - on their ICC plans, Indyk said. “That has nothing to do with negotiations, - but if both sides can’t be persuaded to back down, then they will be on - a trajectory that could lead to the collapse of the Palestinian Authority - because it can’t pay wages anymore.</p> - <p>“That could be an issue forced onto the agenda about the same time as - a potential nuclear deal.”</p> - - </article><div><p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/steven-mufson"><img src="http://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/files/2014/07/mufson_steve.jpg&h=180&w=180"></a></p><p>Steven Mufson covers the White House. Since joining The Post, he has covered - economics, China, foreign policy and energy.</p> - - </div>
\ No newline at end of file |